According to the reports, Blake Lively filed a “super shaded” demand before publicly accusing his co -star “with us”, Justin Baldoni or sexual harassment in his complaint.
The lawsuit was filed in September before the company of the student of “Gossip Girl”, Vanzan, as the plaintiff in an attempt to allegedly cite the text messages of the now former Baldoni team without the name of Lively, will be attached to the Daily Mail.
The former publicist of “Jane the Virgin”, Stephanie Jones and her company, Jonesworks, received a summons requesting all documents and communications on Baldoni, Lively and her husband, Ryan Reynolds.
According to reports, Jones lit private messages among former employee Jennifer Abel, who continued working with Baldoni, and Public Relations Crisis Manager Melissa Nathan.
Since then, the messages have been used by Lively’s legal team as the basic for the statements that Baldoni, Nathan and Abel orchestrated a smear campaign against the acres of “another simple favor”, 37, while the promotion “ends with us” in August 2024.
An alleged text by Nathan said: “We can bury anyone.”
The lawsuit, however, retired on December 19, 2024, a few days before the animated accused of Baldoni or sexual harassment in a complaint filed before the California Civil Rights Department.
A legal expert referred to tactics as “super shaded” while talking with the Daily Mail. “Intentionally they did this to really work in a very surreptitious and clandestine way,” said lawyer Ron Zambrano, who is not related to the case, he said at the exit.
Baldoni’s lawyer Bryan Freedman also criticized the lawsuit as a “farce” in a statement to page six.
“The company of Mrs. Lively and Mr. Reynolds, Vanzan, had nothing to do with this case and knew it,” Freedman said.
“This simulated demand was designed to obtain citation power without supervision or scrutiny, and in doing so, my clients denied the ability to dispute the property, nature and scope of the citation.
“There is nothing normal in this. Court officers have the duty to cross before the Court and an obligation not to present fictitious demands that do not have a basic law or law … This was done in bad faith and constitutes a flagrant abuse of process.”
Lively’s legal team, however, denied any irregularity.
“There is nothing wrong here, only a conscientious and exhaustive investigation,” said their lawyers Esra Hudson and Mike Gottlieb in a statement until the deadline.
“The animated parties acted on reliable information and used common tools, such as civil demands and citations that are completely legal and appropriate to pursue claims and discover the identity of unknown perpetrators,” these sandy.
“This demand unearthed the documented plan of the Wayfarer matches, in their own words, in their own text messages, to” destroy “Blake Lively, a plan that is executed without transparency, dissemination or notification for the public, the public, the public, the public, the public, the public, the public, the public, the public, are not public.” “” “
“We have absolutely nothing to hide: Mrs. Lively voluntarily revealed the citation in her first presentation knowing that she would finally occur to Wayfarer parties in the discovery, and that is precisely.
Representatives of Fuderers de Lively and Baldoni immediately to page six to comment.
The “Age of Adaline” star filed her complaint on December 21, 2024, accusing the actor/director of sexual harassment and trying to take her career after her work on the adaptation of Colleen Hoover’s novel based on domestic violence.
Lively filed a formal lawsuit on December 31. Baldoni denied all the accusations against him.
In January, he filed a demand of $ 400 million against Lively and Reynolds, 48, who the couple has tried to be fired.
