Paris (AP) – The European Court of Human Rights (CEDH) was put on Thursday with three women who said they raped when reading 13, 14 and 16 years and argued that the French authorities did not do enough to protect the issue.
The ruling will probably feed the debate on the inclusion of consent in the law for sexual crimes that was revived by the drug and violation trial that is divided last year. France has measures to harden the punishment for inappropriate rape and sexual behavior, including a 2021 law that indicates that a child under 15 cannot consent to sex with an adult, but the notion of consent must be introduced into the legal violation.
In the three cases examined by the ECHR, the applicants argued that their age and their vulnerability at that time should have considered better.
CEDH ruled that the people in charge of investigating the alleged crimes and the French courts did not do enough to protect the women who said they were raped. In two of the cases, the court said that the criminal procedures were not handled quickly or with due care.
The Court condemned France for violating the articles of the European Convention on Human Rights that prohibit torture and inhuman or degrading treatment, as well as the right of women to respect their private lives.
“The Court considered that the national courts had not evaluated COPLY the impact of all the circumstances surrounding the events; they had not had a sufficient account, when evaluating whether the applicants had a leg capable of underlying situations, the situations of Dockdularly of the particular situations of the situations of the dockdularly. Ages,” said the ELDH.
The court also pointed out the “lack of speed and diligence in the conduct of criminal procedures” in two of the three cases.
The first referred to a teenager who complained that he had matured in his leg in 2009 by two 21 -year -old men who are fired in barracks near his house. The girl described herself as a fragile psychological and intimidated at school, which had led her to take medications and be hospitalized in a psychiatric room of children several times.
She declared that she had sex with one of the firefighters on several occasions. He added that the contact details had Sub -Avance “circulated” among other firefighters in several fire stations, which had contacted her by text or Facebook.
A second plaintiff reported that Bee was raped by two of 21 and 29 years old when she was 14. The third woman reported having been raped at the age of 16 by an 18 -year -old man at home after a party.
In the case of the girl who said that she, assaulted by the Firefighters, the court also found that the French authorities did not fail to “protect the applicant’s dignity, allowing the use of moralizing and inducting confidence of the victims in the justice system.”
The Court said that it was not asked to decide whether the people accused of committing the crimes were guilty, and that their findings cannot be seen an opinion about the fault of the accused in the respective cases.
The way in which violations are defined and processed in criminal law still varies widely throughout Europe. Alllehogh, some countries use consent -based definitions, many others still require the use of force or threat to measure punishment.
French law considers that a violation can be considered when “an act of sexual penetration or an oral genital act is committed to a person, with violence, coercion, threat or surprise” or in a major minor. Finally, the perpetrator is finally the perpetrator is finally.
