For most Americans, the big problem with the Democratic Party is that they have moved too much to the left in recent years. If you are among those who believe that, get ready.
The sausage is still coming.
A severe impulse is being carried out to take away the party even more from the political center, adopt economic plans near pure socialism and launch cultural battles of radical awakening.
It sounds like a joke, but it is really happening. And it is a movement that goes beyond the dreams of socialist fever of Senator Bernie Sanders and the representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
Altheheshole of the Push is a reaction to Donald Trump’s elections in November and his hug of America’s policies, fury reflects more than just Trump’s disorder syndrome.
Consider the main sentence in a recent fundraising email.
“Democratic voters because a more progressive game,” Beed, a launch of a extreme left group called Justice Democrats.
To my surprise, a legitimate national survey supports the claim, and others hint the same trend.
Survey USA, in survey tasks earlier this month, found that 50% of others said they wanted the party “to become more progressive,” 24% said they should “remain the same” and only 18% said “more measures measures.”
Lower approach rating
I have been trying to wrap my head around the findings, but I can only ask me how much the Democrats can go before falling from the face of the earth.
Sanders, Ocasio-Cortez and his angry travel companions apparently aim to find out.
His great and bustling manifestations have to do with what Sanders calls “ubercapitalism”, but current history and events show that socialism always adds to human misery.
Perhaps the new power couple on the left should make a research trip to Cuba and Venezuela to see for themselves.
Or they might ask the 12 million illegal immigrants Joe Biden note why they risked life and limbs to get here if the United States is such a terrible and rotten place to live and work.
One thing that radicals cannot deny is that the DEM party that voters rejected last in November last November has its lowest national approval index in less than 30%.
Most of that sad vision is because it is already seen as too much to the left.
The reasons are obvious: the party is largely antipole and pro-critical, it is plagued with anti-Semitism and some members of Congress are foolishly fixed to defend gang members who came to the United States as part of the illegal migration wave.
In addition, the party leaders never with a tax increase did not accept and made Elon Musk Public Enemy No. 1 for daring to try to reduce the fraud and waste of the federal budget swollen and full of debts.
Democrats, elite universities and a network of NGOs fattened in taxpayers’ money are reacting as if the world ends if only a penny was cut.
These and similar positions put well to the party outside the American mainstream, so what would it mean to be even more progressive?
And where are the voters who are willing to support that madness? They are certainly not among those common sense Americans fleeing the high -tax and infested blue states of the crime.
The answers to find new voters are vague out of necessity. As justice democrats insist on their email speech, “too many democratic leaders continue to chase the center, executing republican-lite campaigns that do not reflect the values of the people who placed them in office.”
Younger, more radical
So, is modernation the enemy and no demo that respects itself should be trapped anywhere near the center of the political spectrum? I understand.
Except that Biden and Kamala Harris had the farthest administration in the modern era, and the results were disastrous for the nation and the party.
However, the desire to drink more of Kool-Aid is the presence of frequent among young Democrats.
The Harvard Youth Survey published last week shows that of young people aged 18 to 29 who voted for Harris last November, only 23% approve or what the Democons of Congress are doing.
This is also divorced from reality. Democrats in Congress have opposed all that Trump has proposed, including their cabinet nominees.
Most would not stand when Trump talks about a joint session of Congress, he greeted families who lost loved ones to migrant murderers. Nor were they transferred by a 13 -year -old boy with cancer that the president honored.
The only time the Democrats have committed themselves this year was when the senate minority leader, Chuck Schumer, and nine other Democrats voted to keep the government open instead of killing a project of republican spending law that would close the government.
Schumer was right when he said that the Democrats would be blamed for the closure, but the left is so anxious for a fight that because he was burn everything.
Because of his problem, Schumer has been attacked by his party, with the calls for AOC to challenge him in a primary.
That would not be until 2028, but the idea of using primary battles to rebuild the young and more radical party is now in sight.
A main antagonist is David Hogg, the 25 -year -old weapons activist who was recently appointed vice president of the National Democratic Committee.
The measure aimed to show young voters that the party was open to their generation and ideas, but immediately failed spectacularly.
HOGG said he would begin a billionaire background to challenge the headlines of “Axeleep-The-Wheel” in the primaries.
Put the victory
His commitment shook the former guard, whose objective is to expand its members, not to trade with the old people of new radicals.
“No DNC officer should try to influence the result of a primary election, either on behalf of a headline or a challenger,” said DNC president Ken Martin, in a call with journalists. “Voters must decide who our main nominees are, not DNC leadership.”
Althegh Trump and the Republicans of Congress are the objectives, the determination of the Democrats to marginalize themselves is not necessarily good for the country in general.
The bipartisan system works better when competition is about voters who are slightly right or the left of the center. The need to attract these Swing voters has a moderating influence on the government as a whole.
The Presidents Template his agenda to vote for it does not cost its members, especially in the Chamber, where control has been changing in recent years.
Trump lost the house two years after the Republican party swept the 2016 elections, and Biden lost it in the 2022 periods.
From that moment on, most of their domestic agendas were dead.
The employer shows that voters punish presidents and parties that are considered too far from the environment.
The rarity now is that Trump’s survey numbers are sliding and with the Republican party that has the most narrow house as possible, the control could easily change next year.
All of which makes the behavior of the Democrats so strange. Most are willing to endanger their Victoria chans in favor of moving further to the left.
Good luck with that.
